|
Post by Admin on Mar 18, 2019 11:47:23 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 22, 2019 12:05:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 22, 2019 12:06:57 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 24, 2019 15:37:14 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 24, 2019 15:41:53 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 1, 2019 17:50:44 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 5, 2019 14:26:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 7, 2019 9:22:57 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 7, 2019 10:31:27 GMT
"The scientific papers that don’t agree with the general consensus on climate, are full of flaws and don’t even agree with each other. “There is a 97% expert consensus on a cohesive theory that’s overwhelmingly supported by the scientific evidence, but the 2–3% of papers that reject that consensus are all over the map, even contradicting each other. The one thing they seem to have in common is methodological flaws like cherry picking, curve fitting, ignoring inconvenient data, and disregarding known physics.”" Here’s what happens when you try to replicate climate contrarian papers A new paper finds common errors among the 3% of climate papers that reject the global warming consensus www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2015/aug/25/heres-what-happens-when-you-try-to-replicate-climate-contrarian-papers
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 7, 2019 10:44:34 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 7, 2019 15:46:46 GMT
"What all political and social thinking has finally been forced to face is, of course, the irreversible degradation of the environment by unrestrained industrial capitalism: the enormous fact of which science has been trying for fifty years to convince us, while technology provided us ever greater distractions from it."
~ Ursula K Leguin
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 7, 2019 17:15:44 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 8, 2019 11:20:05 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 10, 2019 10:47:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 13, 2019 10:54:31 GMT
|
|