|
Post by mark on Jun 5, 2018 22:59:20 GMT
You keep talking about the threat of extreme right, I just want to know where it is. If the National Socialist were not socialist, what were they? Is it required for members to agree with you? As for Antifa, according to them, everyone who disagrees with them is a fascist... and most of them live with their mother and get an allowance. I know a couple.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 5, 2018 23:08:10 GMT
You keep talking about the threat of extreme right, I just want to know where it is. If the National Socialist were not socialist, what were they? Is it required for members to agree with you? As for Antifa, according to them, everyone who disagrees with them is a fascist... and most of them live with their mother and get an allowance. I know a couple. No it is Not required for members to agree with me, as long as we all abide by the forum guidelines. Nor is it required that i agree with members. You have the internet, access to the same news, information & web sites, & perceive the World it seems incredibly differently to the way that i do & a percentage of others, as well as a percentage of people being in agreement with your own position & views. i suppose that is humans for you. i am quite happy to leave it at that & agree to disagree. i don't really see the point in arguing / debating political definitions? See the 20th Century for a more detailed analysis of all these arguments / debates & the global events around it all. On an intrinsic level i'm Not really that interested. i just posted some links from alternative media which i find more accurate personally. By all means within the forum guidelines post whatever links / articles / opinions / research that you like.
|
|
|
Post by mark on Jun 5, 2018 23:13:17 GMT
You don't want to discuss what you write?
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 5, 2018 23:19:49 GMT
You don't want to discuss what you write? i am happy to discuss what i write - But we have a very obvious difference of opinion / World view. You know what my own position / viewpoint is. i don't really see the point in a 'discussion' where i present the same answers repeatedly, while you state the same thing repeatedly in disagreement / negation - it's Not an open dialogue. i don't really see what this has to do with the mission statement of this forum / project? & you didn't answer the question - Are you neutral & objective about mental health areas & politics? You can very easily run a Google search on the 'Global rise of far right nationalism populism' & make up your own mind on it all. You obviously don't see it as a problem, which is your prerogative.
|
|
|
Post by mark on Jun 6, 2018 1:21:58 GMT
You don't want to discuss what you write? & you didn't answer the question - Are you neutral & objective about mental health areas & politics? I believe the worse about mental illness and homelessness here in America. It is getting better for Veterans, not sure anymore about what is happening on the street. By several accounts, there are roughly 55,000 homeless people in the Los Angeles area, am sure there is a significant percentage that have mental health problems.
Where I get into trouble is pointing out that this isn't Trump's fault, nor is it because of conservatives. California is a solid Democrat state, our governor, our assembly, and Los Angeles is run by Democrats on the city, and county level. They are in charge and they have done nothing but toss a little money at it. To be fair to them, it is a complex problem, and there is no easy solution... I can't think of one.
Also, there is the issue of illegal immigration. Illegals are going to the front of the line for limited social services, and I don't blame them for accepting help. I hear politicians saying we want to help everybody. That is a noble idea, but most of the money is going to one group, and our legal citizens are going without.
|
|
|
Post by snowstorm on Jun 6, 2018 6:59:42 GMT
If the National Socialist were not socialist, what were they? Just going back to my history lessons and I think that they used the word 'socialist' in the party name to appeal to the broadest range of voters, even though they weren't.
|
|
|
Post by mark on Jun 6, 2018 7:14:50 GMT
Didn't the Nazis nationalize everything, provide "free" healthcare, and start government work projects like the autobahn?
|
|
|
Post by snowstorm on Jun 6, 2018 7:42:43 GMT
|
|
|
Post by mark on Jun 6, 2018 7:48:57 GMT
So am I.
|
|
|
Post by snowstorm on Jun 6, 2018 7:56:52 GMT
Democratic?
I'm just highlighting that word in the wiki.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 6, 2018 8:01:16 GMT
Didn't the Nazis nationalize everything, provide "free" healthcare, and start government work projects like the autobahn? Yes, for the master race - Not for all the degenerates, undesirables & those unworthy of life, they started draconian social programs to get rid of them all, that very quickly developed into the Aktion T4 program which was the mass killing of all the mentally & physically disabled & mentally ill, before turning their attention on killing all the Jews & other inferiors.
|
|
|
Post by mark on Jun 6, 2018 8:08:38 GMT
Maybe I am confused on some points as to label.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 6, 2018 8:09:46 GMT
Maybe I am confused on some points as to label. Have you studied history & politics? Have you studied what actually happened leading up to & around WW2?
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 6, 2018 8:30:30 GMT
Maybe I am confused on some points as to label. You would have been one of the first to be rounded up & exterminated Mark under 'Democratic Socialism' / Fascism & the Aktion T4 Program - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aktion_T4
|
|
|
Post by mark on Jun 6, 2018 15:56:30 GMT
It is still socialism. The socialist of today talk all the time about race and putting people into groups.
|
|